February 13, 2005

Incumbent Protection Racket

There was entirely too much free speech going on in the last election, and Congress aims to do something about it. In a TCS column, Ryan Sager says the proposed Senate bill is all about protecting incumbents:

Last week, a bill was introduced in the Senate that would force 527s to register with the Federal Election Commission and restrict the groups' ability to raise and spend money.

The bill enjoys the support of Trent Lott, who had been one of 41 senators to vote against McCain-Feingold. Now, however, he's decided that any money given by wealthy individuals is "sewer money."

And why is this money so dirty suddenly?

"It was an unintended consequence of McCain-Feingold. Instead of going to the parties, rich people are putting money into these 527s in the dark of night," Lott told the Sun Herald in Biloxi, Miss.

In other words, some of those rich people might be trying to throw out incumbents.

McCain is even more blatant about the incumbent-protection angle. As The Washington Times reported last week, "McCain said lawmakers should support the bill out of self-interest, because it would prevent a rich activist from trying to defeat an incumbent by directing money into a political race through a 527 organization."

"That should alarm every federally elected member of Congress," McCain said.

Indeed, it certainly does.

Posted by dan at February 13, 2005 08:11 PM
Comments

Any legislation that is written for the purpose of helping or inhibiting one party or another should be against the law. Any legislation written to circumvent previously written legislation should be against the law. any legal representive ,judge, or other officer of the court that reinterprets the law should to held to account. legalese should not require constant reinterpretation by the courts. All law should be easy to understand.

Posted by: dale tucker at February 14, 2005 09:25 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?