September 30, 2004

Oh, Really?

If John Kerry is going to make it his position that Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism, he needs to be confronted with some Inconvenient Facts at the debate tonight, and for the remainder of the campaign. From Stephen Hayes, who has been all over the Saddam - Al Qaeda links from the beginning:

...it's not difficult to understand why Kerry's campaign wants to separate Iraq and the war on terror. But to claim that Saddam had "nothing to do with al Qaeda?" That there was no terrorism in Iraq before the war? That Iraq has never been a threat to the United States? These are preposterous statements. They're not debatable, or a matter of interpretation. They are demonstrably false.

Here are some relevant facts about Iraqi support for terrorism:

* On March 28, 1992, the Iraqi Intelligence Service compiled a 20-page list of terrorists the regime considered intelligence assets. Atop each page was the designation "Top Secret." On page 14 of that list is Osama bin Laden. The Iraqi Intelligence document reports that bin Laden "is in good relationship with our section in Syria." The document has been vetted and authenticated by the Defense Intelligence Agency. The existence of the document was first reported on CBS's 60 Minutes. It has been widely ignored.

* Saddam Hussein hosted regular conferences for terrorists in Baghdad throughout the 1990s. Mark Fineman, a reporter for the Los Angeles Times, reported on one such gathering in an article published January 26, 1993. "There are delegates from the most committed Islamic organizations on Earth," he wrote. "Afghan mujahideen (holy warriors), Palestinian militants, Sudanese fundamentalists, the Islamic Brotherhood and Pakistan's Party of Islam." One speaker praised "the mujahid Saddam Hussein, who is leading this nation against the nonbelievers. Everyone has a task to do, which is to go against the American state."

* Abdul Rahman Yasin is an Iraqi who mixed the chemicals for the bomb used in the first World Trade Center attack on February 26, 1993. We know this because he has confessed--twice to the FBI and once on national television in the United States. He fled to Iraq on March 5,1993, with the help of an Iraqi Intelligence operative working under cover in the Iraqi Embassy in Amman, Jordan. A reporter for Newsweek interviewed Yasin's neighbors in Baghdad who reported that he was living freely and "working for the government." U.S. soldiers uncovered Iraqi government documents in postwar Iraq that confirm this. The documents show Yasin was given both safe haven and financing by the Iraqi regime until the eve of the war in Iraq.

* Later that same month--March 1993--Wali al Ghazali was approached by an Iraqi Intelligence officer named Abdel Hussein. Ghazali, a male nurse from Najaf, met another IIS agent named Abu Mrouwah who gave him an urgent mission: assassinate former President George H.W. Bush on his upcoming trip to Kuwait. On April 14, Kuwaiti police found Ghazali and other Iraqi Intelligence assets with two hundred pounds of explosives in a Toyota Landcruiser. Ghazali, the would-be assassin, told a Kuwait court that he had "been pushed by people who had no mercy." He said: "I fear the Iraqi regime, the Iraqi regime pushed me."

* According to numerous press reports, the deputy director of Iraqi Intelligence, Faruq Hijazi, met face-to-face with Osama bin Laden in 1994. Bin Laden asked for anti-ship mines and al Qaeda training camps in Iraq. There is no indication that Iraq made good on his requests.

Lots more.

UPDATE: Power Line has more on Kerry's squirming on Iraq.

Posted by dan at September 30, 2004 12:46 AM
Comments

Tonight's debate made me feel more confident that Senator Kerry is prepared to lead our country into the right direction. Senator Kerry was very poised, answered questions clearly, and was able to bring up points (such as nuclear proliferation) that have been ignored for much of President Bush's tenure.

I believe that Senator Kerry performed best because he dissolved the general opinion that he could not connect with the American people. This debate was no doubt the first time that many people have heard Senator Kerry's message, and he delivered a great first impression. President Bush's strongest point, one that is not the major focus of our problems, was that you cannot send mixed messages to your troops or to the terrorists. I believe that is true; Senator Kerry is not sending mixed messages to them but is analyzing the situation and is willing to make adjustments when needed.

Senator Kerry's strongest point was that the War on Terror has not been handled properly, and our brave servicemen and women were brought into a situation that we were not prepared for. He illustrated how President Bush made numerous errors of judgement and was too arrogant to change his course of action.

Bravo, Senator Kerry. Thank you for bringing a strong and concise message to the American people.

Posted by: Mica at September 30, 2004 11:16 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?